Pokémon Go gamers imagine the buying and selling system, which requires trainers to be in shut proximity with one another slightly than permitting them to commerce over lengthy distances like within the core collection, is “anti-Pokémon.” Of their view, the restriction goes in opposition to one of the vital philosophies of the franchise.
“Let me commerce with my long-distance buddies,” mentioned one Pokémon participant by way of a Reddit thread posted on May 9, sparking a community-wide dialogue on the subject.
That dialog starter was accompanied by a meme highlighting how having the Fortunate Bonus utilized to a long-distance good friend is meaningless because it’s unattainable to commerce with out assembly up. Others echoed the sentiment, saying buying and selling must be attainable while not having to be close by—like within the core collection. They may nonetheless have bonuses utilized to in-person buying and selling to encourage gamers to satisfy up, however there’s no purpose why they shouldn’t be allowed to commerce over lengthy distances.
This prompted one participant to say that buying and selling in Pokémon Go is and has at all times felt “too anti-Pokémon.” A whole lot of others agreed. They even claimed different features about it match the invoice too, like not with the ability to commerce any Pokémon greater than as soon as, which makes it arduous to retain Pokémon that evolve from trades.
The explanation for that is trading causes Pokémon IVs to randomize. If Niantic allowed gamers to commerce repeatedly, they might maintain buying and selling till their critters had the right stats. An answer might be to permit gamers to commerce a selected Pokémon as soon as per day, but when they caught and traded a big amount, they might nonetheless commerce them till they obtained one with good stats.
Both approach, some gamers insisted they’d be happy to sacrifice the IV randomization element of buying and selling if it made for a greater buying and selling system.
Ultimately, they concluded Niantic won’t change a thing because it won’t benefit the company. The group seems convinced Niantic isn’t in their corner, particularly not as of late. Niantic’s determination to go forward with the controversial Remote Raid Pass changes regardless of widespread backlash from gamers was the largest indicator of that, and the lower runs deep.
